Millennials Could be Foregoing Equity Wealth

While reams of research have been done on why members of the Millennial generation are less likely to own a home compared to their baby boomer and Gen X elders at the More »

MBS RECAP: Best Levels in More Than a Week Ahead of CPI

CPI (the Consumer Price Index) has been the most relevant economic report on the horizon since the balmy NFP report from 2 weeks back.  Reason being: NFP contained a strong wage growth More »

Homes Sales and Prices in California May Have Hit an Affordability Tipping Point

It may be that California, where home prices have exploded over the last few years, has jumped the shark when it comes to affordability.  CoreLogic’s Andrew LePage writes in the company’s Insights More »

Construction and HELOC Products; Non-QM Webinars; Mr. Cooper PUF Acquisition Details

“Rob, we just went through our third staff reduction. Have you heard of any vendors that work on forecasting or doing ‘what if’ scenarios for lenders rather than us doing layoffs?” Sure More »

MBS Day Ahead: Fed Day, Bounce Day?

I’m going to talk about the potential for a friendly bounce in bonds today.  I want to be clear right up front that I’m presenting this as one of two possibilities, and More »

Rebuilding high-risk homes from California wildfires could cost $18B

The 48,390 homes dubbed during impassioned or high risk from a California wildfires blazing by a state could cost $18 billion in reconstruction, according to a CoreLogic analysis.

The Camp Fire, that has Northern California adult in flames, is putting an estimated 31,394 homes, with a sum reformation cost value of about $7.3 billion, during high or impassioned risk as of Nov. 11. Southern California’s Woolsey Fire, inspiring areas from Thousand Oaks to Malibu, is putting 16,996 homes during impassioned or high risk, with a reformation cost value of $11 billion.

The CoreLogic Wildfire Risk Score evaluates intensity dangers to a skill by deliberation slope, aspect, vegetation/fuel and aspect composition, and a vicinity of a home to aloft risk areas that could impact it around windblown embers, according to a company.

California homeowners and servicers related to properties influenced by a wildfires can empty a series of service options.

Homeowners might hindrance payments for adult to 12 months but incurring late fees and but being reported to a credit bureaus, according to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac healthy disaster service policies. Servicers might postpone or revoke debt payments for adult to 90 days but initial carrying hit with a homeowner. Servicers contingency also postpone foreclosure or authorised record for properties believed to be affected.

Because President Trump issued a vital disaster declaration for Butte, Los Angeles and Ventura counties on Tuesday, a Department of Housing and Urban Development can now offer a following assistance: a 90-day duration on foreclosures of Federal Housing Administration-insured home mortgages; FHA word to houses broken or shop-worn to a indicate where reformation or deputy is necessary; and a ability for homeowners who mislaid their properties to squeeze or refinance a house, along with repairs, by a singular mortgage.

Affected residents or business owners pang waste from a wildfires might request for supervision assistance by DisasterAssistance.gov.

Article source: http://www.nationalmortgagenews.com/news/rebuilding-high-risk-homes-from-california-wildfires-could-cost-18b

Millennials Could be Foregoing Equity Wealth

While reams of research have been done on why members
of the Millennial generation are less likely to own a home compared to their
baby boomer and Gen X elders at the same age, the Urban Institute (UI) notes that
knowing the reasons doesn’t necessarily shed much light on the potential long-term
implications of this behavior. Delaying homeownership, according to UI analysts
Jung Hyun Choi and Laurie Goodman, may reduce the wealth the generations’ members will acquire over their lifetime.

Goodman and Choi used a dataset called
the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) which has tracked individuals since
1968 to identify individuals who reached age 60 between 2003 and 2015 and
gather information on their histories, including the age at which they bought
their first homes.  Half of the older
adults in the sample became first-time homebuyers between 25 and 34 and 27
percent bought before age 25.  However,
among today’s younger age groups only 37 percent of those age 25 to 34 and 13
percent of those 18 to 24 owned a home in 2016.

 

 

The authors found that buying at an
early age gives those that do so “a big bang for their housing buck.”  Individuals who made their first venture into
homeownership between ages of 25 and 34 had median housing wealth in their
early 60s of $150,000 while those who waiting until they were 35 to 44 accumulated
$72,000 less.  Those who didn’t buy until
their 45th birthday or later accumulated median wealth at least $100,000
less than those in the 25 to 34 age group.

Yet, those who bought very young,
before they turned 25
, ended up with only the second largest amount of equity,
a median of $130,000.  UI attributed this
to the group having lower incomes and less education.  At age of first purchase only 19 percent of
this group had obtained a college education compared to more than 50 percent of
those in the other three groups.  Their
income was a median of $53,000 (in $2015 dollars), but the pattern here was
less clear. The group with the highest income, $70,000 was in that second
youngest group while median incomes declined for the two older groups.  Among the oldest buyers it was only $7,000
higher than among the youngest. The youngest group also purchased less
expensive first homes; a median under $70,000 (2015 dollars), while the median
first-home value was around $125,000 for the other three groups.

Those buying before reaching age 25 may
have ended up with less median housing wealth than the second youngest group,
but they still got the largest return on their initial investment.
The ratio
between the median home equity at age 60 or 61 and median price of the first
home decreases with the first age of homebuying: the ratio is highest for those
who bought their first home before age 25 (1.93) and the lowest for those who
bought their first homes after age 44 (0.36). 

 

 

The different in housing wealth
among age groups came both from home price appreciation and from paying down
their mortgage debt.  The group that
bought their first home between ages 25 and 34 live in more expensive homes in
their 60s, a median of $250,000 than those who bought both earlier and later. The
youngest buyers live in houses of lower value, which may be attributed to their
lower education levels, but also have less mortgage debt due to their home tenure,
a median less than $11,000, considerably lower than the other three groups.

 

 

The UI researchers conclude that the
age at which persons buy their first home has a great deal to do with housing
related wealth as they approach retirement.  Thus, the Millennials’ delay could have long-term
economic consequences
for their future and for the nation’s economic well-being
as they fail to build equity, the largest single source of personal wealth, at
the same rate as previous generations.

The authors conclude that “While
people make the choice to own or rent that suits them at a given point, maybe
more young adults should take into account the long-term consequences of
renting when homeownership is an option.”

Article source: http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/11142018_millennials_and_homeownership.asp

Statement Congratulating New GOP Leadership Team

Sign up for email updates from Speaker Ryan

Article source: https://www.speaker.gov/press-release/ryan-congratulates-new-gop-leadership-team

WP Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Bunk Beds