Municipalities are increasingly holding mortgage securitization trusts liable for the upkeep of properties, which could affect investors’ cashflows, according to a new report from Moody’s Investors Service.
Like what you see? Click here to sign up for a National Mortgage News free trial and daily newsletter to get the latest feature stories, news headlines, data, and in-depth analysis on the issues impacting the mortgage industry.
A Moody’s spokesman told National Mortgage News that its analysts, who based their findings on anecdotal conversations with servicers, are finding that municipalities large and small are asking more from servicers when it comes to these properties, even before they are in foreclosure.
Springfield, Mass., and Chicago have backed legislation aimed at holding the trusts liable for property upkeep.
Springfield, for example, calls for servicers to conduct mediation sessions with distressed borrowers within 45 days of foreclosure notice or face fines, something Moody’s said could increase already-lengthening foreclosure timelines.
Some of the costs would be as follows, according to Moody’s: Servicers would pay a $100 vacant property registration fee in Springfield ($250 in Chicago) once the service determines the property is uninhabited.
Both ordinances require servicers to post a $10,000 surety bond with the city to cover vacant property maintenance at a cost of generally $1,000-$1,500 per property, and then even if the city does not need to collect on the surety bond it returns only about half the bond amount.
Property maintenance costs would be sustained for around 10 months before the servicer takes title to the property on behalf of the securitization.
The two ordinances also both increase the risk of the property owner suing the servicer or trust for making changes or trespassing on property that is not legally theirs.
Municipalities, in general, also are asking for servicers in a growing number of cases to register and put up bonds similar to some requirements of the Springfield and Chicago ordinances.
Daily Briefing | Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Under Investor Pressure, Board to Consider Selling CoreLogic
CoreLogic said recently hired financial advisory firm Greenhill Co. will evaluate the company’s financial strategy and “explore a wide range of options aimed at enhancing shareholder value,” up to and including a possible sale or merger of the Santa Ana, Calif.-based provider of mortgage and property data, analytics, technology and services.
New MBS Repurchase Disputes Could Go to Binding Arbitration
Future mortgage-backed securities repurchase disputes could go through independent third-party reviews and possibly binding arbitration as part of model principles for them released by the American Securitization Forum Tuesday.
Housing Construction Takes Steep Plunge in California
Housing production took a sharp and sudden decline in the nation’s most populous state in July, posting the lowest level of permits since January 2009.
Texas Advisory Firm Working on Four MA Deals
Mortgage Banking Solutions, Woodway, Texas, says it is currently working on four merger-related transactions with announcements on two of them coming shortly.
Case-Shiller: Home Values Rise Again but Concerns Abound
Home prices rose 1.1% in June after a 1% increase in May as values in 19 of the 20 metropolitan areas tracked by the Standard Poor’s/Case-Shiller house price index registered monthly gains.
Zillow Posts First Ever Quarterly Profit
Fresh off its initial public offering of common stock, real estate listing and mortgage rate search website company Zillow posted its first ever quarterly profit since its launch in 2006.
FBR: Government Refi Program Won’t Help MI Industry
Even if the White House can pull off a large scale refinancing program to help troubled homeowners it likely won’t help the mortgage insurance industry much, according to a new report from FBR Capital Markets.
Merrill Offers Suggestions on Refinancing Underwater Loans
Lenders would compete to refinance underwater mortgages if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stopped demanding “put backs” when new loans default, according to mortgage strategists at Bank of America/ Merrill Lynch.