Private Capital at Work in Affordable Rental Housing

While they
aren’t a new concept, the second issue of the HUD publication Evidence Matters highlights the growing
importance of multibank efforts in financing affordable housing developments.  This “consortia” of private banks share the risk, reduce the
cost of lending, and pool together their expertise to meet affordable housing needs in their respective communities.

“Consortia”
came about as a result of the federal
Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program in 1986. Private commercial banks, accustomed to working
primarily with short-term capital, were asked to provide long-term capital,
permanent mortgages, and related services to affordable housing projects and,
in response, formed the first multibank consortia in the early 1990s.

The consortia helps banks meet Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) requirements while
satisfying local affordable rental housing needs. These consortia are able to expand their funding resources by
qualifying with the Treasury as a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI).  This allows member banks to apply for more funds to be used specifically for economic revitalization and community
development works.

The
consortia can be flexible in their approach to development activity as long as
it profits the public and includes low and middle income members of the
community.  Their activities might
include forming community development corporations or forming partnerships with
community-based organizations; creating loan pools to finance affordable
housing development, revitalizing low-moderate income areas or underserved
rural areas and participating in tax credit programs.
  The member banks must determine what
credit issues need to be addressed in their community and decide how to contribute to solving
those problems.

The bank
consortia provide services that generally fall into two categories;
capital-based backing of loans or knowledge-based services such as the
provision of technical assistance, guidance in underwriting, loan services, and
asset management.

Member
banks determine their own geographic coverage area. 
This is a crucial decision that must take into account the ability to
provide adequate coverage, the potential to expand and diversity borrowers, and the need to spread out risk.  Members also decide on the lending products they offer and the appropriate operational structures
to adopt.

The Spring 2011 Evidence Matters article features the
Network for Oregon Affordable Housing or NOAH, a 22-member non-profit
consortium operating in one of the country’s least affordable rental markets as
an example of the consortia’s operations and potential. 

More than 63 percent of Oregon’s renter
households are low, very low, or extremely low-income and one quarter of the
renter households spend more than 50 percent of their income on housing.  Federally subsidized housing is shrinking at
an alarming rate with 8.1 out of 10 privately owned subsidized units scheduled
to disappear within the next five years. 
An additional 2,700 households were displaced between 1999 and 2008 as
manufactured home parks closed.

NOAH was
established by the Oregon Bankers Association in 1990 and uses various
financing and technical assistance tools to help developers build and renovate
affordable housing throughout the state.  The member banks contribute to a blind loan
pool where the banks participate in any loan that the 12 member board and its
loan committee approve.  The committee is
composed of bankers and two public-sector representatives charged with
evaluating the public benefit of any loan under consideration. NOAH’s
professional staff works out the details of each loan.

NOAH also
has a permanent loan program which, as of last June, had financed 6,445 units
of housing with 139 permanent loans.  The
loans, totaling more than $158 million, were used to leverage $726 million in
project costs.  NOAH also offers
predevelopment loans and staffs a statewide initiative to preserve at-risk
federally subsidized rental properties. 
This initiative had preserved 416 units of subsidized housing by the end
of last year.

These
investments are not without return.  A
model developed by the Association of Oregon Community Development
Organizations with the assistance of the National Association of Home builders
attempted to measure the economic impact of the affordable housing developed by
the Associations’ members between 1990 and 2002.  It concluded that the $94 million invested in
7,562 affordable housing units had helped generate 12,212 jobs, $393 million in
wages, and $23 million in income taxes.
 
In addition, the original investment leveraged $408 million from private
and federal sources. 

The most important impact: Renters in the
units constructed by these organizations paid about $267 less per month in rent

than if they lived in market rate units and the increased purchasing power (a
total of $24 million) of these families supported 833 ongoing jobs

“In light of these outcomes,” the
article concludes, “bank consortia like NOAH, which stimulate the available
supply of affordable rental housing with capital loans, are an integral part of
safeguarding the future well-being of American communities and building
community capacity for sustainable, long-term growth.”

Related MND Content….

READ MORE: Builder Report Offers Reminder. Affordable Rental Units Needed


READ MOREHUD Focused on Rebuilding America’s Dilapidated Housing Inventory

read more:  Affordable Housing Units Needed for Low Income Renters

READ MORE: The Dearth of Affordable Rental Housing

READ MORE:  Gimme Shelter: Homelessness Rate Climbing. Low Income Rental Units Needed

Article source: http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/06232011_rental_housing.asp

Leave a Reply

WP2FB Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Bunk Beds