The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s
seasonally adjusted purchase only price index (HPI) shows that U.S. house
prices rose slightly in the third quarter of 2011. The HPI is calculated from data on home sales
obtained from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae acquired purchase money mortgages
where previous mortgages were also held by one of the government sponsored
enterprise (GSE). In addition to its
usual analysis of home price data, the report looks at the effects of supplementary
information added to the analysis last quarter and at the impact of the
increase in the prices of and demand for certain commodities in recent
Home prices rose 0.2 percent on a seasonally
adjusted basis from prices in the second quarter. On an unadjusted basis prices were up 0.7
percent. Prices in the third quarter
were 3.7 percent lower than in the third quarter of 2011. The index which tracks monthly prices showed
an increase of 0.9 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from August to
September and 0.7 percent on an unadjusted basis.
Month-to-month, prices rose to varying
degrees in eight of the nine census divisions.
Only the East South Central division lost ground during September, a
slight 0.2 percent decline. Increases in
most of the census divisions were under 1 percent but the East North Central
division had a 1.5 percent increase and the West North Central division a 2.5
percent jump. The quarterly index
declined in 21 states and the District of Columbia.
FHFA Principal Economist Andrew Leventis
said, “In most regions of the country, third-quarter home values were
relatively stable, even in some areas that experienced sharp price declines in
preceding quarters. While most housing
markets still face stiff headwinds, the fact that some beleaguered states –
such as Idaho, Florida, and Utah – saw quarterly price increases is a positive
The -3.7 percent price change in the national
purchase-only index since the third quarter of 2010, when combined with the 4.8
percent increase in the price of other goods and services over that period, results
in an inflation-adjusted price of homes that is down approximately 8.1 percent
over the last year.
FHFA also produces an all-transactions
index which combines purchase data with data from GSE acquired mortgages used
for refinancing. This index was up 0.9
percent quarter-over-quarter but down 4.3 percent on an annual basis.
in the second quarter of 2011, FHFA published an “expanded data” HPI which
supplements GSE mortgage data with information from FHA endorsed loans and with
county recorder information. To the
extent that differences exist, it is hoped that the expanded data will better
reflect price trends for houses not financed by the GSEs.
the table shows, both the original and the expanded index posted a 0.2 percent
change between the second and third quarters of 2011. However, over the last four quarters, the two
measures diverge somewhat; the expanded index measure evidences a slightly less
severe decline of 2.9 percent instead of the 3.7 percent drop in the purchase
differences for individual states is more pronounced but tends to be less
dramatic over the four-quarter time period which may indicate that some of the
difference between the two indexes is the result of statistical noise from
notes that the housing bust of the last five years coincided with a boom in
commodities prices, especially oil and petroleum products but also coal,
precious metals, copper, and agricultural products. While this boom has negatively affected much
of the country, some areas have benefitted from the price increases and, in
areas that are net producers of these goods, the commodity price increases have
worked to offset the effects of the housing bust. In fact, in some such states the increases in
employment and income have driven up housing prices.
FHFA did a
special analysis of the rise in commodity prices by identifying states where
more than 2 percent of the population is employed in “mining, quarrying, and
oil and gas extraction (the MQOGE Sector).
Eight states, Alaska, Wyoming, North Dakota, West Virginia, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Texas were identified as MQOGE sector states.
above compared five-year house price changes for the eight high MQOGE states
against price changes in the other states using FHFA’s purchase-only house
price index. The average five year
decline for the nation as a whole was 19 percent while the price changes for
high MQOGE states ranged from -12 in New Mexico, the only state with a negative
change, and +17 percent in North Dakota.
While this is interesting it is
not definitive as rural states in general have fared better during the housing
bust and the eight high-MQOGE states are relatively rural so the observed
phenomenon might be a function of their rural nature. However, when these
states are examined on the county level, the difference between housing price
changes in counties with high MQOGE employment and those without, the positive impact
of the employment becomes more apparent.