Should national housing policy move beyond its traditional
emphasis on homeownership to focus more broadly on “shelter?” Faith Schwartz, CoreLogic Senior Vice
President, presents that alternative in the current issue of The Market
Pulse. She points to recent data from
several sources to suggest that such a change could be necessary.
The level of homeownership has been a concern for several
years as it has drifted down from its 2006 peak of nearly 70 percent to a
current level of 63.6 percent, a 40 year low. Now the National Association of
Realtors (NAR) says that the share of first-time homebuyers is at 32 percent, a
near 30-year low and the third consecutive year it has declined. Recent gains
in home sales have come from repeat buyers, those with dual incomes according
to NAR’s senior economist Lawrence Yun.
Meantime rental demand continues to climb and vacancy rates
remain low. Key to this is that
Millennials have been unable or reluctant to make the jump to homebuying. That generation has not embraced
homeownership, largely because of financial considerations, the way earlier
Rising rents are cutting into renters’ ability to save for a
downpayment. The rental portion of the
Consumer Price Index has gained 4 percent just this year and the effect is
compounded by slow wage growth for Millennials although that is changing and
may soon allow them to save for a downpayment and qualify for a mortgage loan.
Schwartz says the governments focus has traditionally been
on homeownership, supporting Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA, giving tax
deductions for mortgage interest, etc.
But the data suggest that these efforts are not as effective in helping
young people as they form households.
She asks “Do we need to do more for the millions of renters? We need to have a much stronger conversation
around multifamily affordable housing stock that is available in the same
geographies as available jobs.”
She quotes her CoreLogic colleague San Khater: “Homeownership is often perceived as always
superior but there are many reasons it may not be. Moreover it implicitly exposes the fact that
subsidies are not just tilted to ownership but are demand side subsidies not
supply side where the issue is most dire.”