Judge allows warrantless evidence in Denver-area terror case

World News

By SADIE GURMAN, Associated Press

DENVER (AP) — The National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance programs have the potential for abuse but did not violate the constitutional rights of a Denver-area suspect in a terror case who argued that government spying has gone too far, a federal judge ruled.

Warrantless wiretaps were used appropriately in the case of Jamshid Muhtorov, who was accused in 2012 of providing material support to an Uzbek terrorist organization active in Afghanistan, Senior U.S. District Judge John Kane said in his Thursday ruling. The evidence against Muhtorov consists largely of phone calls and Internet communications.

The case touches on concerns raised by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden about the federal government’s expanding spying practices. It was the first time the U.S. Justice Department publicly acknowledged that it would use information from a warrantless program against someone suspected of terrorism.

Muhtorov sought to throw out evidence against him gathered through warrantless surveillance, saying it violated constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

Kane concluded that a 2008 amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the federal government to tap into phone calls and e-mails, including those of U.S. citizens, without a specific warrant as long as the surveillance is targeted at a foreigner living overseas.

But he acknowledged that the government is susceptible to using the act as an “end-run” around wiretap laws that require a judge’s approval for domestic electronic surveillance. And the law’s limitations are “riddled with loopholes” that allow for rights violations, Kane said.

But in the Muhtorov case, the government used the surveillance appropriately for legitimate foreign intelligence purposes, Kane said.

Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, which helps represent Muhtorov, said the group and the suspect’s public defenders have not decided how to proceed.

“The statute that the government relied on here allows the dragnet collection of American’s international phone calls and emails, and we continue to believe the statute is unconstitutional,” Jaffer said. “The government’s investigative interests could be accomplished with a narrower statute that accommodated stronger safeguards.”

Muhtorov, who was arrested with $2,800 in cash, two shrink-wrapped iPhones, an iPad and a GPS, has denied the charges against him.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Leave a Reply